MICHAEL DIDN’T WANT TO GIVE EX-WIFE ANY MONEY
THE FACTS
In his will, Michael Jackson admits he “intentionally” left out ex-wife Debbie Rowe Jackson from his will.
THE SPIN
Say what you will about Michael, but how gangster is it of him to flat out say in his will that he didn’t want na’an cent of his estate going to Debbie Rowe?
In the will, Jackson wrote: “I have intentionally omitted to provide for my former wife, Deborah Rowe Jackson.”
She couldn’t even get his second favorite glove. Yikes.
The will, dated July 7, 2002, estimated his estate at that time at more than $500 million. But seven years is a long time, and a recent AP report places Michael’s net worth at $236 million.
The star has some $300 million in debt.
His estate was made up mostly of “non-cash, non-liquid assets, including primarily an interest in a catalogue of music royalty rights which is currently being administered by Sony ATV, and the interests of various entities.”
Translation: I have no cash, but I can sell you a jingle.
Jackson named Mama Kat as the beneficiary of his will and guardian of his three children. However, if Katherine died before him or couldn’t serve as guardian, he nominated Diana Ross to be guardian.
YOUR SPIN: Should Mike have left Debbie a couple dollars? Tell us here.
Image courtesy of google.com
(*The views contained herein are solely the views of their respective authors, and do not express the views of TV One. TV One does not take responsibility for their content.)
Nope Michael did the right thing. He isn’t stupid. he knows that it was all about the money so he’s keeping his legacy within his family, not his ex-wife.
THAT’S WHAT I’M TALKING ABOUT. MICHEAL IS GANGSTER EVEN WHEN HE IS NOT IN THE PHYSICAL PRESENCE OF THINGS. HE KNOW HOW TO MAKE HIS ENEMY HIS FOOT STOOL.HE LEFT SUCH A LEGACY BEHIND.
Not one cent. She does not even deserve her own children. He did the right thing.
You kept in the house Mike. That’s the way a real brother does it.
I’M SURE SHE WALKED AWAY WITH A HEFTY CHECK WHEN THEY DIVORCED…..SO SHE GETS NOTHING. I LIKED HOW MICHAEL MADE IT PERFECTLY CLEAR THATS SHE GETS NOTHING.
She does not deserve anything. She clearly said she never wanted to be a Mom. The kids were a gift to Michael. Even in an interview I think in 2006 she said they are with their father where they belong. Don’t understand why today because she knows she was left out wants to try to get custody. Oh wait, THE MONEY IF SHE HAS THE KIDS!!!
That’s cold! MJ came flat out and said
b!@#$ I ain’t leavin you s$!%! LOLL But I’m sure MJ had already broken her off some $ to have those kids so she’s already been paid.
Give me a break…she shouldn’t get one penny!! She is in it for the money not the kids. She shouldn’t be able to recant anything that she said about not wanting those kids…she is a pathetic woman and who ever is representing her is even worse…i would be embarrasses to represent someone who said on camera that she didn’t want her kids…..I agree Mike….that was GANGSTA!!!
She shouldn’t get any money, they were divorced. I am sure in the divorce settlement he broke her off a little bit of change. That is what divorce means, done, over!
NOPE NOT AT ALL IT’S HIS MONEY HE DID WITH IT AS HE PLEASED.
Absolutely Not! She was one of the many parasites that leeched off this poor man’s image. She deserves nothing! Rest in TRUE peace Michael. God has got your back, now.
Debbie is a sad and bitter person to sell her kids and come back to collect them assuming theres a price tag or lottery included. Unfitt to be a person!!! Joe needs the straining order agianst her!!!She sold them and they will always remeber that.
Absolutely NOT, she does not deserve anything. Mike did the right thing.
Michael did the right thing,Debbie did not want to be apart of their lives then so why now, she did not want kids, don’t take them now thinking you will get paid for having your very own children, Debbie is a said. Fight Kat for your grandchildren, if unable share joint custody with Ross as he named the two in his will. Will rest in peace knowing his three kids are in one of there hands.
My question is what’s up with Donald Trump? Is he going to help Debbie Rowe buy back her Children? These Children are not commodities and they should be left alone, this should of been done while “The Late Micheal Jackson” was alive now everyone coming out of the wood works. If they touch those Children we ought to let go and let God handle them and believe me the Lord will.
We saw the “Movie the OMEN” I’m not trying to spoke anybody out,but you just don’t go messing with the “forbidden fruit”.
Those children are to be left alone until they are able to make their own decision.
Hell to the NO!
Debbie Rowe, after listening to her money-hungry attorney/s, took the money deal and surrendered her rights as a parent…end of story!
correction: spook not spoke
No if she didn’t have not even a close friendship after the divorce then no. It even shows today. People need her to respond on the custody of Micheal Jackson’s children and she not responding. She don’t need to be in the children’s lives anyway. She only wanted Micheal because of his title and because of all the money she had. If Micheal was broke she would have never loved him forreal.