THE FACTS
A designer claims Kelly Rowland has yet to returned borrowed outfits.

THE SPIN
So three months ago a designer by the name of Laura Dawson lent Kelly Rowland several outfits over in London. They include two pairs of shorts, a sequined hoody, two skirts and a red shirt which Kelly used to perform.

Since then Dawson has tried repeatedly to get her stuff back to no avail.

Dawson told Londoner’s Dairy: “It is really unfortunate that this has happened. I would otherwise have liked to continue to work with this particular client.”

Already people are whispering, “Ooh, Kelly Rowland must be broke! Damn that Beyonce!”

Quit that now. You don’t need to send her some scratch off tickets, I swear.

Kelly has made plenty of millions over the years so I doubt she’s pulling a Foxy Brown because she can no longer make ends meet.

It’s likely that she, like many celebrities, enjoy free stuff and think everything handed to them is a freebie. Celebrities tend to be the biggest cheapskates (it’s why I sometimes want to be famous) so I’m sure Kelly just assumed the stuff was hers to keep and recycle.

But Kizzy Ro, that’s not your stuff so get those items dry cleaned and sent back via UPS, Fed Ex, or whatever carrier is your preference.

Source

YOUR SPIN: Do you think Kelly just forgot? Tell us here.

Image courtesy of londonsdiary.com

(*The views contained herein are solely the views of their respective authors, and do not express the views of TV One. TV One does not take responsibility for their content.)

THE FACTS
Kelly Rowland is rumored to be upset over a recent copyright infringement suit involving Destiny’s Child.

THE SPIN
As previously reported, Beyonce was scheduled to testify in court over a copyright infringement suit over the Destiny’s Child track, “Cater 2 U.”

Ultimately, a Destiny’s Child reunion of sorts was in the works as the case also called both Kelly Rowland and Michelle Williams to testify.

That is, until the suit magically went away once the case got settled out of court – preventing the DC3 reunion scheduled for next week.

Although the suit is now settled, is Kelly Rowland mad her name was even brought into it?

That’s the word via That B*tch from Rhymes With Snitch:

Word around the ‘Net is Kelly Rowland, who only recently dropped Mathew Knowles as her manager and hasn’t been seen with Beyonce in years, was pretty pissed off about being hauled into court and was blaming Mathew Knowles’ shady business practices for her involvement in the case.

The terms of the settlement have not been disclosed.

In other Kelly news, Brandy confirmed via her Twitter that she along with Serena Williams are back to their friendly threesome. A few years ago Brandy said she and Kelly fell out over Brandy giving a frustrated Kelly advice to carve out her own niche out of Beyonce’s shadow.

But with Kelly removing Mathew as her manager and forming her own group independent of Beyonce, is Kelly finally about to make her own mark on her own terms?

Source

YOUR SPIN: Would you like to see a DC3 reunion or does Kelly need to do her own thing?  Tell us here.

Image courtesy of google.com

(*The views contained herein are solely the views of their respective authors, and do not express the views of TV One. TV One does not take responsibility for their content.)

THE FACTS
In a recent radio interview 50 Cent addressed various rumors about who he’s been dating.

THE SPIN
Here’s video of 50 Cent’s interview with “The Madd Hatta Morning Show” at 97.9 The Box in Houston.

Basically: He’s not dating Ciara, didn’t buy her a car, isn’t dealing with Kelly Rowland romantically either, but wait he has put aside personal beef with Vivica Fox to cast her in his new video.

Previously 50 accused Aunt Viv of using their relationship for professional gain. I guess all is forgiven now that she’s agreed to do the same for him.

Here are pics of the two on set for 50’s next video, “Do You Think About Me?”

YOUR SPIN: Why do you think Viv went back and did this video?  Tell us here.

Image courtesy of mtv.com and thisis50.com

(*The views contained herein are solely the views of their respective authors, and do not express the views of TV One. TV One does not take responsibility for their content.)